Call Quality Comparison between 100ms and Zoom SDK (with video)

In ideal conditions, both Zoom SDK and 100ms provide comparable video quality. However, under network constraints, 100ms outperforms Zoom by offering lower latency for audio and video transmission, better performance with less CPU and GPU power consumption, and superior audio quality in poor network conditions. While Zoom consumes less memory than 100ms, it experiences higher delays in video transmission and freezes more frequently. Overall, 100ms is a more reliable live video platform even when the network is unreliable.